Email Document Reference

Enter your email address below and the reference for this document will be sent to shortly from webmaster@ceesi.com.

Title: Effects Of Flow Conditioning For Liquid Measurement
Author: Blaine Sawchuk
Source: 2012 International School of Hydrocarbon Measurement
Year Published: 2012
Abstract: dichotomy formed and inadvertently turned into standard practice in the flow measurement engineering business. The present school of thought is that there is a distinction between liquid phase and (gas) vapor phase hydrocarbon flow conditioning, metering businesses, and flow measurement for that matter. The distinction is Reynolds Number, not Phase. It is the intent of this paper to begin the process of rectifying this misunderstanding. By educating our industry into the commonality and differences between the two. Computational Fluid Dynamics is utilized to explain commonality along with citing flow measurement standards. It is common in introductory physics to divide materials into the three classes of solids, liquids, and gases, noting their different behavior when placed in a container. This is a handy classification in thermodynamics, for example, because of the strong differences in state relations among the three. In fluid mechanics, however, there are only two classes of matter fluids and non fluids (solids). Copied from Viscous Fluid Flow, Frank M. White, 3rd edition page 15

In order to prevent spam and automated file downloads for documents within the Measurement Library, please follow the instructions below and then you will be able to email a reference to this article.